PHOTOGRAPHY RUMINATIONS OF PHOTOGRAPHY ILLUMINATIONS
The Site Formerly Known As The Street Bum Series
- HOME
- TAGS
- ARCHIVES
- 12/2001
- 08/2002
- 09/2002
- 10/2002
- 11/2002
- 12/2002
- 01/2003
- 02/2003
- 03/2003
- 04/2003
- 05/2003
- 06/2003
- 08/2003
- 10/2003
- 11/2003
- 12/2003
- 01/2004
- 02/2004
- 03/2004
- 04/2004
- 05/2004
- 06/2004
- 07/2004
- 08/2004
- 09/2004
- 10/2004
- 11/2004
- 12/2004
- 01/2005
- 02/2005
- 03/2005
- 04/2005
- 05/2005
- 06/2005
- 07/2005
- 08/2005
- 09/2005
- 10/2005
- 11/2005
- 12/2005
- 01/2006
- 02/2006
- 03/2006
- 04/2006
- 05/2006
- 08/2006
- 09/2006
- 10/2006
- 11/2006
- 12/2006
- 01/2007
- 02/2007
- 03/2007
- 04/2007
- 05/2007
- 06/2007
- 07/2007
- 08/2007
- 09/2007
- 10/2007
- 11/2007
- 12/2007
- 01/2008
- 02/2008
- 03/2008
- 04/2008
- 05/2008
- 06/2008
- 07/2008
- 08/2008
- 09/2008
- 10/2008
- 11/2008
- 12/2008
- 01/2009
- 02/2009
- 03/2009
- 04/2009
- 05/2009
- 06/2009
- 07/2009
- 08/2009
- 10/2009
- 12/2009
- 02/2010
- 03/2010
- XML
- LINKS
- ETCETERA
StupidLogic.com RSS Feed
This post is titled Opera is now Free! by author SoulJah.
I always have the utmost love for Opera, and this move of them to remove the banner ads usually found on the free versions of Opera is a smart one. In my opinion, Opera is more superior than whatever the Firefox and it's anally inserted Extensions could ever hope for. And I personally detest the SpreadFirefox movement. I mean. WTF. Seeing the affiliate id in the link makes my blood boil. It's like... 'Yo spread Firefox and you can get stuff or something!'
The currs.
If you Firefox users decide to get uppity on me, just try moving your tabs from this current position to another.
Ha'ah I thought so.
Viva la Opera.
pffft. thats easy, theres already a firefox extension that can do that.
By
, at Thursday, September 22, 2005
Opera has no need for no stinkin' extensions. It can do it on it's own.
By
SoulJah, at Friday, September 23, 2005
well since opera doesnt have extensions then it has very limited features. what do you think extensions are for anyway? they're not a useless feature. Opera stole from mozilla anyway :p
By , at Monday, September 26, 2005
Opera had tab browsing first. Opera has mouse gestures first (which Firefox nuts wanted too, so they created an extension to 'copy' Opera). Opera can arrange tabs (which Firefox nuts wanted too, so they created an extension to 'copy' Opera). Opera is customizable by itself, without needing extensions to even customize a single button. For you to say that Opera is limited in features just signifies yourself to be a Firefox sheep, herded by bumbling developers.
By SoulJah, at Monday, September 26, 2005
The currs.
If you Firefox users decide to get uppity on me, just try moving your tabs from this current position to another.
Ha'ah I thought so.
Viva la Opera.
Posted by SoulJah at 12:46:00 AM
pffft. thats easy, theres already a firefox extension that can do that.
By
, at Thursday, September 22, 2005
Opera has no need for no stinkin' extensions. It can do it on it's own.
By
SoulJah, at Friday, September 23, 2005
well since opera doesnt have extensions then it has very limited features. what do you think extensions are for anyway? they're not a useless feature. Opera stole from mozilla anyway :p
By
, at Monday, September 26, 2005
Opera had tab browsing first. Opera has mouse gestures first (which Firefox nuts wanted too, so they created an extension to 'copy' Opera). Opera can arrange tabs (which Firefox nuts wanted too, so they created an extension to 'copy' Opera). Opera is customizable by itself, without needing extensions to even customize a single button. For you to say that Opera is limited in features just signifies yourself to be a Firefox sheep, herded by bumbling developers.
By
SoulJah, at Monday, September 26, 2005
